mysteries

Poison on Tap

Other Information

Home

The Paranormal

Mysterious World

UFO's

Cover-Up's

Science Frontiers

Database

Index

Links

Forum

Are chemicals being added to our drinking water for sinister purposes? Evidence suggests that we are being medicated secretly with drugs that modify our behaviour.

If it was suggested to you that, without your knowledge, you were being medicated with a substance more poisonous than lead, which could lead to brittle bones, cancer and a catalogue of other illnesses, and it is a central ingredient in mind-altering drugs, you would probably be more than a little alarmed. Yet this is what some qualified doctors and health advisors are alleging is happening to millions of people in the UK and around the world. The offending substance? Fluoride in our drinking water.

Most of us know fluoride as the 1950's discovery that was to save teeth from decay. And it was added to most UK toothpastes in the 1970's, supposedly to reduce unpleasant childhood visits to the dentist. Yet there is a sinister side to fluoride’s history.

Truth Decay.

Evidence suggests that fluoride can harden the surface enamel of teeth, but the chemical is also highly toxic, and has been linked to a large number of physical and mental ailments. Published studies have shown that half the amount of the fluoride currently added to UK drinking water (hexafluorosilicic acid) can cause genetic damage.

Since World War II, no thorough research has gone into the potentially lethal affects of fluoride. However, a number of scientists, including Dr Hans Moolenburgh, one of the most vocal anti-fluoride campaigners in the Netherlands, are deeply concerned that many countries in the West are in a dangerous and sinister mass-medication scheme first developed in Nazi Germany.

During the darkest days of World War II, hundreds of thousand s of innocent people were exterminated in German and Russian concentration camps. Death from disease, starvation and extreme brutality was an everyday occurrence, and this was regularly compounded by the use of drugs and chemicals. Nazi scientists, keen to maintain a climate of fear, had found an easy method of controlling the behaviour of camp inmates.

Brain Drain.

Repeated doses of very small amounts of fluoride were found to affect the brain, slowly poisoning and narcotizing people, making them submissive. Eager to exploit the effects of the drug, both German and Russian camp commanders added fluoride to the drinking water.

The effects of the fluoridated water greatly impressed German and Russian intelligence. They considered fluoridated water the ideal means of controlling Allied populations once their countries had been invaded by the German forces. Anticipating victory in the war, the German chemical manufacturers I. G. Farben, based in Frankfurt, became responsible for mass producing fluoride for the death camps and other possible future uses.

Global Mind Control.

At the end of World War II, the US sent Charles Eliot Perkins, a research worker in chemistry, pathology and physiology, to study the mind-control technology of I. G. Farben. Perkins drew several shocking conclusions from his investigations in Germany. He reported that ‘when the Nazis, under Hitler, decided to go into Poland... the German General Staff and Russian General Staff exchanged scientific and military ideas, plans and personnel and the scheme of mass control through water medication was seized upon by Russian Communists because it fitted ideally into their plans to communise the world...’

Perkins did not directly implicate Allied intelligence in his investigation of Russian global mind control, but a closer look at I. G. Farben and their industrial relations throws up some suspicious international connections.

Western Backing.

I. G. Farben expanded massively in the 1920's as it merged with the Wall Street concerns of the likes of Henry Ford’s motor company, J. P. Morgan’s General Motors and Standard Oil, owned by the Rockefeller family.

Millions of US dollars were invested in these concerns in the 1930's, and this relationship continued throughout World war II. Coincidentally, it is interesting to note that no I. G. Farben factories or plants were bombed, sabotaged or even damaged by the Allies during the war. It has been claimed by researcher and author Ian E. Stephens that specific instructions were given to bombing mission commanders, possibly from the higher levels of the US government, to avoid these buildings. But for what reason?

Since the US economic depression in the late 1920's, organisations such as the Rockefeller Foundation and the Ford family were publicly encouraging long-term policies in population control. It is also known that a number of influential figures in US commerce and industry invested a substantial amount of time and money in I. G. Farben projects before and after the war. Among them was the Mellon family.

The Mellon family, founders of the Mellon Institute, established itself in 1913 as an organisation independently sponsoring advances in science and industry. The institute was also to ‘discover’ that fluoride was an ‘amazing fluoride preventative’.

Financial Gain.

Coincidentally, the Mellon family also founded the Aluminium Company of America (ALCOA). Fluoride is the highly toxic byproduct of aluminium manufacture, and ALCOA were frequently - and successfully - sued for poisoning cattle, crops and waterways. Safe disposal proved expensive, so what could be done to eliminate these costs and, perhaps, even turn in profit from the waste material?

ALCOA and other fluoride-producing industries funded the research which appeared to indicate that small quantities of the chemical were not harmful to humans. Eventually, research suggested that fluoride reduced tooth cavities. Promoters concentrated on what they saw as health benefits, completely ignoring the known adverse cumulative effects of this highly toxic substance.

Selective Research.

Scientists working for the American Dental Association (ADA) on behalf of ALCOA continued promoting fluoride, despite its abuse by the Germans and Russians. Although dozens of scientists and pressure organisations disputed the claims of the pro-fluoride lobby, public opinion quickly embraced the alleged qualities of the new dental saviour.

To the alarm of many scientists who strongly disputed the alleged health benefits, the ADA launched a campaign to promote fluoride. Endorsement by the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) strengthened public confidence in the new ‘wonder drug’, and by the mid 1940's a handful of major US sites had begun fluoridating their water supplies. Propagandists obtained ‘endorsements’ from institutions who accepted the health claims without question, and the green light was given for a nationwide fluoridation campaign.

Medical Doubts.

From the late 1950's, the USPHS channelled millions of US taxpayers’ dollars to other countries to promote fluoridation, and many nations - including the UK - leapt onto the bandwagon. But most European countries rejected fluoridation out of hand, and others that tried it soon stopped because of adverse health effects and general ineffectiveness.

The common belief is that treatment with fluoride is affective for a lifetime, yet research shows that any protection disappears before the person enters their 20's. In fact, a number of medical and dental experts say there is no evidence that fluoride benefits teeth at all.

To the embarrassment of the US National Institute of Dental Research (NIDR), independent analysis of a 1988 NIDR report on dental data of 39,107 US children showed that there was virtually no difference in the number of tooth cavities in children from fluoridated and non-fluoridated areas.

So what purpose does fluoridated water serve? Its high toxicity is widely recognised, and recent declassified documents released in the US confirm that the military knew of fluoride’s adverse effects on the brain as early as 1944.

Available on Prescription.

Investigation into other uses of fluoride is revealing. Since World War II, tranquillizers, ranging from the mild sedatives prescribed for depression to the potent mind-altering drugs, have become a multi-million dollar industry.

Over 60 tranquillizers on the market contain fluoride, which profoundly increases the potency of other substances. Fluoridating the ubiquitous tranquillizer Diazepam (Valium) produces a new, stronger tranquillizer, Rohypnol. Both are manufactured by Roche products, another subsidiary of I. G. Farben. along with other similar drugs. The powerful fluoridated tranquillizer Stelazine is widely used in retirement homes and mental institutions around the world.

As more information about the water fluoridation is revealed, the more the public’s anxiety appears to increase. Proponents quote hundreds of studies proving fluoride’s effectiveness in negating tooth decay, but the union of professional scientists at the US Environmental Protection Agency point to deliberate cover-ups of grave risks to human populations and the denigration - and even sacking - of ethical scientists who dare to speak up.

Troubled Waters.

To most dentists, fluoridation is a ‘wonder drug’, counteracting poor oral hygiene and dietary problems. To others, it is an insidious and cynical method of modifying our behaviour and a means of allowing industry to profit from a dangerous waste product. Many lay people regard fluoridation as enforced mass-medication. The deliberate denial of risks by health officials has led others to regard fluoridation as a form of social control. They point to the history of fluoridation and its documented links with what is perhaps one of the most evil regimes of the last century.

Fluoride Facts.

Fluoride is more poisonous than lead, whose value in drinking water should not exceed 0.5ppm. The level of fluoride in our domestic drinking water is 1.5ppm.

A report published by the Florida International University states: ‘0.45ppm of sodium fluoride solution is enough to slow down sensory and mental reactions.’

A correlation between areas of high water fluoridation and appalling dental health has been found in Sicily.

Around 5.5 million people drink artificially fluoridated water in the UK.

The US Food and Drug Administration considers fluoride an unapproved drug for which there is no proof of safety or effectiveness.

Sources: The X Factor